Βιβλία σαν το «The Corrections»

The parents at Pirriwee Public had a baffling fondness for costume parties. It wasn’t enough that they should have an ordinary trivia night; she knew from the invitation that some bright spark had decided to make it an “Audrey and Elvis” trivia night, which meant that the women all had to dress up as Audrey Hepburn and the men had to dress up as Elvis Presley. (That was another reason Mrs. Ponder had turned down the invitation. She’d always abhorred costume parties.) It seemed that the most popular rendition of Audrey Hepburn was the Breakfast at Tiffany’s look. All the women were wearing long black dresses, white gloves and pearl chokers. Meanwhile, the men had mostly chosen to pay tribute to the Elvis of the latter years. They were all wearing shiny white jumpsuits, glittery gemstones and plunging necklines. The women looked lovely. The poor men looked perfectly ridiculous.

This is the only part of the Interview that resembles a professional exchange. We will dance around certain words, such as “nanny” and “child care,” because they would be distasteful and we will never, ever, actually acknowledge that we are talking about my working for her. This is the Holy Covenant of the Mother/Nanny relationship: this is a pleasure—not a job. We are merely “getting to know each other,” much as how I imagine a John and a call girl must make the deal, while trying not to kill the mood.

Δε μπορώ, όχι, δε μπορώ να την υποφέρω πια!… Τι πληγή είν’ αυτή που μου ’στειλες, θε μου; Τι αμαρτίες έχω κάνει για να με τιμωρείς τόσο σκληρά; Ως πότε θα την έχω στην καμπούρα μου; Ως πότε θα ’μαι υποχρεωμένη να την ανέχομαι, να βλέπω τη μούρη της, ν’ ακούω τη φωνή της, ως πότε; Δε θα βρεθεί επιτέλους κανένας στραβός χριστιανός να την πάρει, ν’ απαλλαγώ απ’ αυτό το έκτρωμα της φύσεως, που μ’ άφησε ο πατέρας της για να μ’ εκδικηθεί – που χαΐρι και προκοπή να μη δουν εκείνοι που δε μ’ άφησαν να κάνω την έκτρωση!…

Congressman Nixon had asked me why, as the son of immigrants who had been treated so well by Americans, as a man who had been treated like a son and been sent to Harvard by an American capitalist, I had been so ungrateful to the American economic system.The answer I gave him was not original. Nothing about me has ever been original. I repeated what my one-time hero, Kenneth Whistler, had said in reply to the same general sort of question long, long ago. Whistler had been a witness at a trial of strikers accused of violence. The judge had become curious about him, had asked him why such a well-educated man from such a good family would so immerse himself in the working class.My stolen answer to Nixon was this: “Why? The Sermon on the Mount, sir.”

As you grew up, when you were grown, totally unknown to yourself, you confused your father with God. You never saw him as a man with a man’s heart, and a man’s failings—I’ll grant you it may have been hard to see, he makes so few mistakes, but he makes ’em like all of us.

It took him only a few moments to reach that decision. The council would not act hastily; it never did. There would have to be long speeches, condemning him, but if this child’s father had actually used the word punish, a much more serious penalty than outlawing might be in store. His enemies had grown so outspoken that some might even demand death; if they convinced themselves that he was indeed a spy for the northern tribes, this would be logical.